|
''The Dhammapada: With introductory essays, Pali text, English translation and notes'' is a 1950 book written by philosopher and (later) President of India, Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan (1888–1975), about the Dhammapada, an important Buddhist scripture. Originally published in 1950 by Oxford University Press, the book has been republished numerous times by the same publisher, most recently in 1997. A 2007 Indian edition was published by Pilgrims Publishing. The book has been reviewed in several professional journals.〔〔〔〔 All editions have had 194 pages and have used the same title. ==Outline of book== Radhakrishnan's ''Dhammapada'' contains original Pali text as well as English translations of the Dhammapada's 26 chapters. It begins with a preface composed in 1950 in which Radhakrishnan states that
The preface also states that
Next is a 57-page introduction that is divided into two main sections. The first introductory section, less than 3 pages in length, is entitled simply "The ''Dhammapada''," and briefly summarizes the ''Dhammapadas historical context, noting that its verses connect with incidents in the Buddha's life "and illustrate the method of teaching adopted by him."〔 The second section, entitled "Gautama the Buddha,"〔"The second Introductory Essay on ''Gautama the Buddha'' is reprinted with the kind permission of the British Academy from the ''Proceedings of the British Academy'', Volume XXIV, being the Annual Lecture on a Master Mind delivered on 28 June 1938." p. vi, Radhakrishnan's 1950 Preface).〕 has several subsections: : *I. Life (pp. 4-15). Contains a biographical outline of the Buddha's early life, marriage, renunciation, search for and encounter with truth, founding of his order, some major manners and themes of his teaching, and passing away. Notes that "the Buddha was more definitely opposed to Vedic orthodoxy and ceremonialism than was Socrates to the State religion of Athens, or Jesus to Judaism, and yet he lived till eighty.... Perhaps the Indian temper of religion is responsible for the difference in the treatment of unorthodoxies."〔 : *II. The Four Truths (pp. 15-26). Describes the Four Noble Truths taught in Buddhism, that 1) sorrow (''duhkha'') is pervasive in life as we know it, 2) Sorrow has a cause (''samudaya''), 3) sorrow can be removed (''nirodha''), and there is a path (''marga'') beyond sorrow, the Eightfold Path.〔 : *III. The Buddha and the Upaniṣads (pp. 26-35). "Gautama the Buddha," Radhakrishnan argues, "has suffered as much as anyone from critics without a sense of history. He has been cried up, and cried down, with an equal lack of historical imagination."〔 He explains that "To know what the Buddha actually taught or what his earliest followers thought he did, we must place ourselves in imagination in the India of the sixth century B.C.... Great minds make individual contributions of permanent value to the thought of their age; but they do not, and cannot, altogether transcend the age in which they live.... Even when they are propounding answers which are startlingly new, they use the inadequate ideas and concepts of tradition to epress the deeper truths towards which they are feeling their way."〔 He quotes the Buddha as stating that "'there are... four truths of the Brāhmins which have been realized by me... and made known"〔〔"'there are these four truths of the Brāhmins which have been realized by me by my own higher knowledge and made known (''Aṅguttara'', iv. 195; ''Saṁyutta'', xxii. 90). He characterizes his ''dharma'' as ancient (''purāṇa'') - as eternal (''ṥāṥvata'' or ''sanātana''). He compares it to the discovery of an old buried forgotten city (''Nagara Sutta''). He is said to be a knower of the Veda (''vedajña'') or of the Vedānta (''vedāntajña'') (''Saṁyutta'', i. 168; ''Sutta Nipāta'', 463)." (p. 29, footnote 1).〕〔Radhakrishnan quotes Max Müller (1901), who states that Buddhism is "the highest Brāhmanism popularized, everything esoteric being abolished, the priesthood replaced by monks, and these monks being in their true character the successors and representatives of the enlightened dwellers in the forest of former ages" (Müller, ''Last Essays'', 2nd series, p. 121).〕 stating that the Buddha's teaching "is derived"〔 from the Upaniṣads. : *IV. Metaphysical Views (pp. 35-52). Notes that "the Buddha discouraged doctrinal controversies as prejudicial to inward peace and ethical striving."〔 Discusses attempts to view the Buddha as adhering to various metaphysical positions, especially 1) agnosticism, 2) atheism, or 3) belief in a "transempirical reality in the universe" and a "time-transcending element in the self."〔 Argues that the third interpretation (belief in a transempirical reality) is most consistent with what is known of the Buddha. : *V. Spiritual Absolutism (pp. 52-57). Here, Radhakrishnan states that "The tradition of teaching by silence has been an ancient one in India,"〔 and argues that "If the Buddha declined to define the nature of this absolute or if he contented himself with negative definitions, it is only to indicate that absolute being is above all determinations. It is difficult to differentiate this supreme being from the Absolute ''Brahman'' of Advaita Vedanta or the super-God of Christian mysticism as formulated in the writings of the pseudo-Dionysius."〔 "The Buddha's reasons for his silence are quite intelligible,"〔 states Radhakrishnan, and he enumerates five motives for the Buddha's silence.〔1. A climate of bold speculation, pungent speech in which "it was difficult to draw a shap line between the supersititon of the ignorant and the sophistry of the learned" (p. 54); 2. Doctrinal controversies could distract from the need for each adherent to realize the truth by personal effort; 3. The Buddha's mission was "to interest not merely the intellectuals, but the common people" (pp. 54-55); 4. "Fourthly, the affirmative theology, in its anxiety to bring the absolute into relation with the relative, makes the absolute itself relative." (p. 55); 5. "Fifthly, the nature of absolute reality is supra-logical, and it is idle to insist on giving logical accounts of it" (p. 55).〕 Also in the fifth section, Radhakrishnan offers his interpretation of three "inadequacies" or "exaggerations" in the Buddha's thought, which "revealed themselves in () later history and relation to Hinduism."〔 These are that i) "Philosophy is a natural necessity of the human mind,"〔 and the Buddha's hearers were unable to adopt suspended judgement on the ultimate questions; ii) "The Buddha's conception of ''dharma'' as the absolute reality was not sufficiently concrete for practical purposes";〔 and iii) The Buddha taught that one could renounce householder duties at any age. Radhakrishnan states that these "exaggerations" are understandable if we realize that in the Buddha's time, attempts to lead the spiritual life had to contend with "three great enemies... the theologians, the ritualists, and the worldlings."〔 The largest part of the book (pp. 58–187) consists of a romanized transliteration of the original Pali text, plus a verse-by-verse English translation. Two examples are shown in the table at right. Many verses are augmented with footnotes or are followed by commentary, presented in a smaller font size than the verses themselves. The book concludes with a short selected bibliography, a 4-page Pali index (indicating which verses contain a specified word), and a 2-page general index. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Dhammapada (Radhakrishnan translation)」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|